Press Releases
Current and Archived Press Releases from SCS and Partners
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Friday, October 30, 2026
CONTACT:
Anna Davis
SCS Communications Director
anna@californiasalmon.org
State Water Board Votes to Adopt Bay-Delta Plan, Ignoring the Requests of Tribes
After 2 days of hearings, the State Water Board approved the Bay Delta Plan, including Voluntary Agreements opposed by Tribes, fishing families, and conservation groups.
Sacramento, CA - Yesterday, the State Water Resources Control Board (Board) voted 4 to 1 to adopt the update to the Bay-Delta Water Quality Control Plan (Plan). This is the first major update to the Plan in decades. The Plan lets the largest water rights holders meet environmental requirements through the so-called “Healthy Rivers and Landscapes” Voluntary Agreements (VAs) instead of the enforceable flow standards supported by Tribes, environmental justice communities, fishing communities, and conservation groups.
The vote came late last night after two days of comments to the State Water Board from 16 groups of commenters and over 100 individual commenters. Speakers included state agencies, local agencies, Tribes, fishing communities, and conservation groups. Many traveled long distances to Sacramento to give their public comments in person and many more joined remotely. Public comments closed around 6:45 PM and the Board continued late into the night, ultimately creating a third change sheet for the Plan before voting at 11:00 PM.
Tribal members, fishing families, environmental advocates, and youth, including youth from the Karuk, Hoopa Valley, and Yurok Tribes, urged the Board to reject the VAs as part of the Plan. Tribes were not party to writing the Voluntary Agreements and spent years raising concerns before the Board. Tribes on the Trinity and Klamath Rivers also warn that the Plan threatens their rivers’ recovery, two years after the removal of the Klamath dams.
The Plan designates “Tribal Tradition and Culture” as a beneficial use in the Bay Delta, which marks the first designation of the Board’s 2017 Tribal Beneficial definitions. Additionally, the Plan includes the creation of a Bay Delta Tribal Advisory Group.
“The adoption of the Bay Delta Plan was unfortunately predictable. We are disappointed that after years of comments from Tribes opposing the VAs, the Board still moved forward with the inclusion of VAs in the Plan. We are glad that CUL beneficial uses will be designated but with our diminishing trust in the Board to follow through with commitments to better partnerships with Tribes, we are worried CUL beneficial uses will not be adequately protected. Despite this decision, we will continue to push for adequate flows for salmon.”
– Kasil Willie, Policy Director, Save California Salmon, responding to the adoption of the Bay Delta Plan
Yesterday's vote shows that the State Water Board will continue to make decisions about Tribal waters without listening to Tribes. California cannot secure its water future while leaving out the original stewards of its rivers.
​
XXX
​
Related resources:
Download PDF
State Water Board Votes to Adopt Bay-Delta Plan, Ignoring the Requests of Tribes
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Thursday, October 1, 2026
​
Contact: Anna Davis
SCS Communications Director
Newsom Vetoes Protections for Tribal Sacred Sites and Water Rights
Five days after apologizing to California Tribes, Newsom vetoes the California Indian Freedom Act and the Indigenous Water Rights Act, show the Governor's apology was words without action
Sacramento, CA - Yesterday, Governor Gavin Newsom vetoed the California Indian Freedom Act (AB1881) and Water Policy for California Native American Tribes (AB2218). Both bills aimed to expand protections for California Tribal cultures, religion, land, water, and sovereignty.
​
“As a California Yurok and Karuk tribal person, I should not have to wonder whether a future change in state leadership or agency policy could prevent me and my family from accessing our religious and cultural sites that we have been maintaining since time immemorial. If the governor believes these protections create uncertainty, despite bipartisan support, he should at least have the decency to tell us exactly what he wants to see for us to have these basic protections.” - Brook Thompson, Interim Executive Director of Save California Salmon
The lands and waters at the center of both bills were not ceded by California Tribes. They were taken. The rivers that have sustained Tribal communities for thousands of years have been dammed, diverted, and mined, and the sacred places along them placed under state and private control without Tribal consent. Despite all of this, Tribes have never stopped caring for these places, and their knowledge of how to steward them is older and deeper than any state agency's. AB 1881 and AB 2218 would have expanded tribal partnership and stewardship to protect the landscapes tribes have depended on since time immemorial.
​
Tribal Beneficial Uses do not by themselves resolve inequalities embedded in California’s water management and grant systems. California’s contemporary water system was developed through laws and institutions that largely excluded its Indigenous Peoples. Addressing historic inequality requires more than the Department of Water Resources incorporating tribal voices in existing processes; the state must examine whether its policies, funding structures, and decision-making systems provide equitable opportunities for Tribal governments and peoples.
“The intent of both bills was to move the state towards meaningful reconciliation with California Tribes. Newsom acknowledges the state's historical violence against California's Indigenous People, but when given the chance to rectify those harms and finalize the bills, which had overwhelming bipartisan support, he disappointed us and failed to follow through. The ability to freely practice our traditional religions and resolving the inequities within the state's water regulation system are important issues that we will continue to advocate for in the next administration.” Kasil Willie, Policy Director, Save California Salmon.
​
Gov. Newsom’s concerns about California’s urgent need to secure its water future are valid, that future includes tribal people who are Californians too. There is no water future for the state of California without meaningful inclusion of the original stewards of this land and waterways. Vetoing these two bills, if anything, slows the ability of Californians to find a meaningful path forward to an equitable and secure water future, even as we still fight for our basic American rights to religion and participation.
###
Download PDF
Newsom Vetoes Protections for Tribal Sacred Sites and Water Rights
